Yes, but was he on a long-tern contract? We can only hope
that the board have put aside money fron the so-called 'parachute' payment from relegation to cover such an eventuality as having to remove Nigel.
The performance yesterday was nothing short of disgraceful. Much of the problem is of Nigel's own making for not re-inforcing the squad, particularly in midfield, during the close season.
Posted By: canary_wharf on November 6th 2005 at 10:57:00
Message Thread
- To criticise players in public . . . (NCFC) - canary_wharf, Nov 6, 10:51:10
- Last throw of the dice I reckon... (NCFC) - Delveg, Nov 6, 10:54:47
- I posted yesterday evening - (NCFC) - KentonCanary, Nov 6, 10:57:27
- Hamilton did that after the 5th defeat in a row at Portsmouth - (NCFC) - KentonCanary, Nov 6, 10:52:40
- Yes, but was he on a long-tern contract? We can only hope (NCFC) - canary_wharf, Nov 6, 10:57:00
- I'm not sure what sort of deal Hamilton was on - (NCFC) - KentonCanary, Nov 6, 11:00:10
- Yes, but was he on a long-tern contract? We can only hope (NCFC) - canary_wharf, Nov 6, 10:57:00
- Last throw of the dice I reckon... (NCFC) - Delveg, Nov 6, 10:54:47
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.