Perhaps he doesn't rate out subs so much

Imagine if we don't pay over the odds for hopper and had him, kamara, beccio and holt to pick from

I would hazard a guess he wouldn't leave two on the bench ALL game if we needed something different/extra fire power upfront to win a match

Instead he had jacko (prem quality, not convinced?) and an unfit kamara to pick from

He put jacko on earlier than usual (ok still 76 mins or whenever it was) and gave kamara a short run out without risking injury/fitness etc

I'd say that's progress
But maybe I should take my happy clapper blinkers off and see the reality of the situation lol

We're obviously now a new defensive boring uninspiring football club whose only goal is to emulate stoke's style of play

Total BS imo

Posted By: essexcanaryOTBC on February 10th 2013 at 13:30:25

Message Thread

I Have no problem with the defensive football we play (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 10, 13:25:02
- Perhaps he doesn't rate out subs so much (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Feb 10, 13:30:25
  - Hughton?s (lack of) substitutions criticised (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 10, 13:32:55
    - ... (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 10, 13:37:53
  - And why would he??? (NCFC) - loz, Feb 10, 13:32:08
  - So many iPhone autocorrects, apologies (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Feb 10, 13:31:24
- "lack of desire to go on and win the game..." (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Feb 10, 13:27:44
  - Agreed, Fulham came here for a draw. (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 10, 13:29:49
- I suppose we're then too scared of losing the game by then! (n/m) (NCFC) - DrDublin, Feb 10, 13:26:34

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.