Mirror saying its Becchi, Curtis Davieso and no Hooper

Posted By: Hulk Rules on January 29th 2013 at 22:35:09

Message Thread

Mirror saying its Becchi, Curtis Davieso and no Hooper (NCFC) - Hulk Rules, Jan 29, 22:35:09
- ... (NCFC) - harry boulders, Jan 29, 22:40:36
  - ooooh seems semi reiliable? (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 29, 22:41:50
    - Up to 93 p% then? (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jan 29, 22:42:48
      - lol (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 29, 22:44:11
- not sure I'd be too keen on 3.5mil and .. (NCFC) - avid_canary, Jan 29, 22:38:52
  - We would still need another striker. Maybe RvW for Jackson and Davies looks a good move (n/m) (NCFC) - Hulk Rules, Jan 29, 22:41:29
    - I just can't see Hughton swaping 3 forwards for 3 forwards (NCFC) - RootunTootunHootun, Jan 29, 22:43:09
- Almost certainly rubbish, but ?3.5m plus Morison? (NCFC) - RootunTootunHootun, Jan 29, 22:36:59
  - why is it rubbish? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 29, 22:37:44
    - More than your 92% certainty that we'd sign Hooper? (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jan 29, 22:39:06
      - yep as this has actual sources! (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 29, 22:40:45
        
        So you're admitting your 92% was incorrect (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 29, 23:10:01
        
        not at all! (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 29, 23:13:19
        
        Deal with it (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 29, 23:16:10
    - The price seems a bit steep (n/m) (NCFC) - Duck, Jan 29, 22:38:57
    - No I mean the price, I thought he was near the end of his contract? (NCFC) - RootunTootunHootun, Jan 29, 22:38:42
      - becchio 18 months i think (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 29, 22:40:20
- *Davies* (n/m) (NCFC) - Hulk Rules, Jan 29, 22:36:36
  - Becchio - my 'o' went astray! (n/m) (NCFC) - Hulk Rules, Jan 29, 22:37:02

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.