This game shows why relying on beating Reading, Saints, Fulham etc at home to stay up is
dangerous. Because the way we play we do not really ever seem to impose ourselves on teams at home and put them right on the back foot.
Posted By: Jim on January 26th 2013 at 16:29:14
Message Thread
- This game shows why relying on beating Reading, Saints, Fulham etc at home to stay up is (NCFC) - Jim, Jan 26, 16:29:14
- We seem to be much more up for it against the bigger/better teams (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Jan 26, 16:31:57
- Shows why we need to spunk out at least ?8m before the window slams shut imo (n/m) (NCFC) - RootunTootunHootun, Jan 26, 16:31:38
- Only ?8 million? (n/m) (NCFC) - Pragmatist, Jan 26, 16:33:00
- Well, in a perfect world probably ?20m, but I was being realistic (n/m) (NCFC) - RootunTootunHootun, Jan 26, 16:36:49
- Only ?8 million? (n/m) (NCFC) - Pragmatist, Jan 26, 16:33:00
- going down (NCFC) - 51eve, Jan 26, 16:30:33
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.