Hmmm. Hucks suggests in his book that Ashton cost considerably less than - Wrath of the Barclay

Hmmm. Hucks suggests in his book that Ashton cost considerably less than

We all assumed. About 2.5 or 2.75 I seem to remember

Posted By: Steve in Holland on January 17th 2013 at 23:16:44

Message Thread

Who is our current biggest buy ever ? Ash or Snod? (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 17, 22:56:36
- Thought Bennett was in the 3 to 3.5 mark reported highest at the time (NCFC) - hoolahan, Jan 17, 23:01:17
  - Only with add ons though I thought. (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 17, 23:03:44
    - More with addons (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jan 17, 23:11:30
- Bassong broke transfer record (n/m) (NCFC) - col canary, Jan 17, 22:58:47
  - No he didn't. McNally specifically said he didn't. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jan 17, 23:00:45
  - But did we really pay as much as 5.5?! (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 17, 23:00:03
    - 3.75m upfront. Same as R Bennett. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jan 17, 23:01:10
      - R Bennett was less. So we are going to break our record if our bids succeed (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 17, 23:05:17
        
        R Bennett was over 3.65m, as it broke the previous record (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jan 17, 23:10:53
        
        Hmmm. Hucks suggests in his book that Ashton cost considerably less than (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 17, 23:16:44
- Hmmm. Wiki says 5.5m for bassong. Really ? (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 17, 22:58:27
- Ruddy probably (NCFC) - lurd, Jan 17, 22:58:07
  - No that would be Molby or that fat fuck from Wimbledon (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 17, 22:59:25

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.