which is a far criticism I think especially if we pick 5 games which stand out for that

QPR, Newcastle, West Ham all at home and Reading and Saints away. A bit more of a positive may have yielded between 6 to 9pts IMO instead of the 5 we got, we may have lost a couple though...

Posted By: Brandonio on January 14th 2013 at 02:10:11

Message Thread

Hoots tactics have been pretty good in my opinion. (NCFC) - usacanary, Jan 14, 00:40:51
- I'm gonna say, I've a cointreau ice pop. Actually, I've had fucking 2 (NCFC) - pants, Jan 14, 00:53:03
  - and, if you can't get past a few words before it getting a bit dizzy, then I'll repeat (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 14, 00:54:24
    - Any Norwich City losing their shit over the last 4 months, IS A FUCKING IDIOT (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 14, 00:54:54
- Agree, would like us to be a bit more attacking against lesser teams though (n/m) (NCFC) - Hulk Rules, Jan 14, 00:42:18
  - I dont think we were that negative vs Newcastle.......... (NCFC) - usacanary, Jan 14, 05:21:23
    - I agree with this. We were often in dangerous positions in the final third (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Jan 14, 07:07:11
    - I also believe that we would currently be in the bottom 3 under Paul Lambert. (NCFC) - usacanary, Jan 14, 05:28:20
  - which is a far criticism I think especially if we pick 5 games which stand out for that (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jan 14, 02:10:11
    - positive approach (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jan 14, 02:10:33
      - a win and a defeat is better than 2 draws (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 14, 09:50:21
        
        not much gets past you hey (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jan 14, 13:42:01

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.