I think most peeps point was that pilks should have been subbed

And not snods, who was clearly making more chances and looked far more threatening than pilks.

Fwiw i thought ALL the midfield were poor, but pilks wes and tettey were far far worse than snoddy!!

Said it before but i have found many hoots subs (and lack of subs) bewildering at times

Posted By: Cheltenham_Canary on January 13th 2013 at 11:40:44

Message Thread

Like someone else said earlier, I don't think Pilks was that bad yesterday (NCFC) - Sugbad The Bad, Jan 13, 11:06:04
- Many of the crosses from both sides didn't even get past the first defender (NCFC) - John in Texas, Jan 13, 13:52:16
- Lineup yesterday to support Simeon should have started with (NCFC) - MaxsHandler, Jan 13, 11:52:14
  - Wes won't release the ball for the sake of it (NCFC) - Sugbad The Bad, Jan 13, 11:56:44
- I think most peeps point was that pilks should have been subbed (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Jan 13, 11:40:44
  - Yes, I'd have made that change too, but only if Snodds would go left side (NCFC) - Sugbad The Bad, Jan 13, 11:47:15
    - Snods looked tired or injured when he went off I thought? (n/m) (NCFC) - MaxsHandler, Jan 13, 12:00:13
      - First 'average' game I've seen him play for ages. He's been amazing lately. (n/m) (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Jan 13, 12:21:50
      - A bit tired, I thought, but he always looks knackered! (n/m) (NCFC) - Sugbad The Bad, Jan 13, 12:01:48
- Thought he was awful yesterday (NCFC) - Hulk Rules, Jan 13, 11:21:25

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.