Completely agree with that
Proven premier league strikers are almost impossible to come by and on some sort of level, you always have to take a punt on someone. We've not a few options and none of them are ideal:
Someone young an unproven at this level
Someone in their mid 20s who has done OK, but not amazingly well, but has room to improve and potential (Jerome, Ebanks-Blake)
Someone from abroad who may not adapt
Someone older who isn't going to improve (CMS, Graham)
Loan someone from a "big club"
At least with Jerome, he's done OK, and Stoke have some genuine quality up front. As long as we start improving our squad then I'll be happy. We've done it with most other aspects of our squad already. Even if it's CMS then he'd still be better than Martin and possibly Jackson, but impossible to say for sure.
Posted By: scruffy on January 8th 2013 at 12:43:05
Message Thread
- Cameron Jerome or CMS, who would you prefer? (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Jan 8, 08:56:49
- Danny Graham (NCFC) - Old Man, Jan 8, 10:00:20
- Danny Graham (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Jan 8, 09:56:52
- I'd want CMS's work rate and Jerome's ability (NCFC) - KentonCanary, Jan 8, 09:55:44
- Completely agree with that (NCFC) - scruffy, Jan 8, 12:43:05
- Danny Graham is younger than Ebanks-Blake (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jan 8, 13:56:20
- Graham is 2 years younger than I thought he was (NCFC) - scruffy, Jan 8, 14:05:12
- Danny Graham is younger than Ebanks-Blake (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jan 8, 13:56:20
- Completely agree with that (NCFC) - scruffy, Jan 8, 12:43:05
- Neither-But Jerome If I Had To Choose. (NCFC) - Martin Peters, Jan 8, 09:48:26
- I don't think CMS is anywhere near a Prem player (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 8, 09:52:31
- I reckon Jerome is better than Morison. Certainly quicker (n/m) (NCFC) - Brom, Jan 8, 09:49:06
- Neither (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Jan 8, 09:41:14
- None (n/m) (NCFC) - Dandy Highburyman, Jan 8, 09:21:27
- Neither would really get my heart racing (n/m) (NCFC) - RootunTootunHootun, Jan 8, 09:15:39
- I think that's who we'll end up with (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Jan 8, 09:32:36
- Think it's nailed on we'll try get CMS (NCFC) - RootunTootunHootun, Jan 8, 09:37:14
- yeah, too many other teams looking at Graham now (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Jan 8, 09:58:34
- Think it's nailed on we'll try get CMS (NCFC) - RootunTootunHootun, Jan 8, 09:37:14
- I think that's who we'll end up with (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Jan 8, 09:32:36
- neither (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 8, 09:10:50
- Definitely Jerome (n/m) (NCFC) - Duck, Jan 8, 09:05:45
- Jerome I think... (NCFC) - Brom, Jan 8, 09:04:42
- cms, just to piss of barham. (n/m) (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Jan 8, 08:58:19
- Don't think hed be pissed off Bridcutt he would (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Jan 8, 09:00:08
- Bridcutt looked good on Sat. Jerome would be OK. (n/m) (NCFC) - colincanary, Jan 8, 09:04:14
- Don't think hed be pissed off Bridcutt he would (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Jan 8, 09:00:08
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.