But we play 1 up top so be graham OR holt? Ok
Posted By: admckechnie on January 3rd 2013 at 11:04:27
Message Thread
- So Danny Graham wants to play every game hence a move......I fail (NCFC) - admckechnie, Jan 3, 11:01:49
- All good points.... So as I suspected either he (NCFC) - admckechnie, Jan 3, 11:35:05
- Just because a player says he wants to play doesn't mean he does (NCFC) - Ben, Jan 3, 11:16:21
- Not the point though..... Where would he fit in (n/m) (NCFC) - admckechnie, Jan 3, 11:32:37
- Surely it's pretty clear.. (NCFC) - loz, Jan 3, 11:35:49
- Totally agree, think he was sort of forced into the one up front (NCFC) - RootunTootunHootun, Jan 3, 11:40:38
- Oh I thought he preferred 1 up front rather than (NCFC) - admckechnie, Jan 3, 11:39:24
- As a striker probably (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 3, 11:34:46
- Surely it's pretty clear.. (NCFC) - loz, Jan 3, 11:35:49
- Not the point though..... Where would he fit in (n/m) (NCFC) - admckechnie, Jan 3, 11:32:37
- Surely he would give Holt a run for his money. .. (NCFC) - loz, Jan 3, 11:13:27
- since when has Holt not been a good finisher? (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 3, 11:38:18
- He didn't say that - he said Graham is a better finisher than Horse and I agree! (n/m) (NCFC) - Kirrie, Jan 3, 12:21:59
- he'll get loads of chances when Holt is either fat, unfit, injured or shit (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Jan 3, 11:17:19
- since when has Holt not been a good finisher? (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 3, 11:38:18
- BUT (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Jan 3, 11:05:12
- Think he'd be more likely to start here than up against Michu (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 3, 11:03:13
- Isn't he mates with Holt? Or did I dream that. (n/m) (NCFC) - Pixelman, Jan 3, 11:25:14
- Both from the north east (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 3, 11:31:56
- Isn't Cumbria North-West? (n/m) (NCFC) - Pragmatist, Jan 3, 11:38:17
- Good point (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 3, 11:39:38
- Isn't Cumbria North-West? (n/m) (NCFC) - Pragmatist, Jan 3, 11:38:17
- Both from the north east (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 3, 11:31:56
- If we bought Michu, he'd start regularly for Swansea (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Jan 3, 11:04:40
- If we bought Michu, he wouldn't play for Swansea anymore (NCFC) - pants, Jan 3, 11:15:51
- Don't they want ?20 million plus? Anyway, got to be more Michus out in that there (NCFC) - woody, Jan 3, 11:07:44
- True.... I like it! (n/m) (NCFC) - admckechnie, Jan 3, 11:05:25
- But we play 1 up top so be graham OR holt? Ok (n/m) (NCFC) - admckechnie, Jan 3, 11:04:27
- Play 2 up front Holt and Graham. (NCFC) - Pit, Jan 3, 11:06:51
- Why would he start with Jackson? He clearly doesn't rate him judging (NCFC) - Jim, Jan 3, 11:27:57
- Plus maybe Hoot will make more subs (NCFC) - Jim, Jan 3, 11:30:21
- Couldnt see us playing without Wes tbh. He was lively against Man City (NCFC) - Pit, Jan 3, 11:46:04
- Plus maybe Hoot will make more subs (NCFC) - Jim, Jan 3, 11:30:21
- Why would he start with Jackson? He clearly doesn't rate him judging (NCFC) - Jim, Jan 3, 11:27:57
- Maybe, but maybe that's not set in stone (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 3, 11:06:23
- Play 2 up front Holt and Graham. (NCFC) - Pit, Jan 3, 11:06:51
- Isn't he mates with Holt? Or did I dream that. (n/m) (NCFC) - Pixelman, Jan 3, 11:25:14
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.