Short keeper that doesn't command his box and doesn't have the same agility of his prime.
No thanks. Not a big enough improvement.
Posted By: Common Sense Police on January 1st 2013 at 16:08:31
Message Thread
- Would Cudicini be preferred over Bunn? (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Jan 1, 16:06:51
- Already moved this window can't remember where (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Jan 1, 16:24:26
- Short keeper that doesn't command his box and doesn't have the same agility of his prime. (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Jan 1, 16:08:31
- Spurs third choice is Gomes. I would go for him (n/m) (NCFC) - Hulk Rules, Jan 1, 16:07:53
- He is terrible to be fair. (n/m) (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Jan 1, 16:09:25
- Thought Cud was 3rd choice (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Jan 1, 16:09:15
- Yep from me! (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Jan 1, 16:07:44
- I used to enjoy our clean sheets..... (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Jan 1, 16:08:05
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.