Sorry, meant 451
Point was that it will be a back 4, not 3 as suggested below.
Posted By: Tricky Hawes on January 1st 2013 at 14:20:28
Message Thread
- 442? (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jan 1, 14:14:47
- with only 1 striker lol (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Jan 1, 14:48:45
- Sorry, meant 451 (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jan 1, 14:20:28
- Doubt he'll change the system. I remember this board was just as negative on NYD last year (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jan 1, 14:16:26
- We didn't play NYD (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 1, 14:17:43
- when was the QPR game again? We won anyway (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jan 1, 14:20:06
- 2nd jan (n/m) (NCFC) - Only1Doherty, Jan 1, 14:30:09
- when was the QPR game again? We won anyway (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jan 1, 14:20:06
- We didn't play NYD (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 1, 14:17:43
- Cafu left back according to Grant Holt on Twitter (n/m) (NCFC) - strap_on sally, Jan 1, 14:16:07
- R Bennett (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jan 1, 14:47:38
- who would play right back (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 1, 14:46:08
- 451 surely (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 1, 14:15:30
- 3-4-2-1 I reckon (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Jan 1, 14:16:13
- It would be mental to play 3 at the back suddenly today (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jan 1, 14:21:35
- 3-4-2-1 I reckon (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Jan 1, 14:16:13
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.