Cannot see that. Has enough problems with absentees, doubt he'll alter the system as well - Wrath of the Barclay

Cannot see that. Has enough problems with absentees, doubt he'll alter the system as well

Posted By: Yellalee on January 1st 2013 at 14:13:00

Message Thread

3 at the back?? (NCFC) - loz, Jan 1, 14:08:08
- And what about Ryan Bennett, Turner, Bassong and Martin then? (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jan 1, 14:09:09
  - Sorry meant Martin and Pilks (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Jan 1, 14:10:15
  - Yep so Bennett instead of tierney? (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 1, 14:10:04
    - Yep, four big'uns at the back. Makes sense against Big Sam. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jan 1, 14:11:40
    - Fancy us to play.. (NCFC) - loz, Jan 1, 14:11:32
      - Wtf (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 1, 14:13:31
        
        Playing Martin and Bennett at full back.. (NCFC) - loz, Jan 1, 14:15:22
        
        Rather 4 at the back than 3! (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 1, 14:16:44
      - For a point (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 1, 14:13:08
      - Cannot see that. Has enough problems with absentees, doubt he'll alter the system as well (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jan 1, 14:13:00
  - Haha!!! (n/m) (NCFC) - admckechnie, Jan 1, 14:09:46

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.