that isn't the issue lol

my point was that not testing their keeper once and them dominating doesn't really tally with a great performance or being unlucky which is what you said

we didn't play badly, just outclassed with tired legs and chelsea deserved to win

Posted By: SCC 28 on December 26th 2012 at 17:04:26

Message Thread

Great performance from Norwich and we were unlucky not to get a point. (n/m) (NCFC) - John in Texas, Dec 26, 16:51:14
- you reckon??? dont think their keeper will get a more boring game all season!! (n/m) (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Dec 26, 16:57:23
  - erm did you see their game last week? (NCFC) - John in Texas, Dec 26, 16:58:59
    - hardly "great" from norwich though!! (n/m) (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Dec 26, 17:00:51
      - maybe great was overstating it, but its not as bad as some people paint it. (NCFC) - John in Texas, Dec 26, 17:04:08
        
        who is saying it was bad? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 26, 17:05:48
        
        Chelsea deserved the win. They are a strong side. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 26, 17:19:42
- hardly great. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 26, 16:53:15
- Disagree that it was great, but it certainly wasn't bad. (n/m) (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Dec 26, 16:51:50
- ??? (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 26, 16:51:47
  - So waht was wrong with that performance. Against most other clubs we would have prevailed. (NCFC) - John in Texas, Dec 26, 16:57:22
    - erm well their keeper didn't make a save (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 26, 16:59:06
      - did you expect us to dominate then? (n/m) (NCFC) - John in Texas, Dec 26, 17:00:50
        
        that isn't the issue lol (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 26, 17:04:26

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.