"Lambert and Culverhouse were a disgrace - giving it large after the goals and afterwards"
Why were they? Their club won by 3 goals ffs. Why was it a disgrace to celebrate?
Posted By: CB41 on December 12th 2012 at 09:34:26
Message Thread
- Last nights view and Lambert and Culverhouse (NCFC) - Pit, Dec 12, 09:18:30
- "Lambert and Culverhouse were a disgrace - giving it large after the goals and afterwards" (NCFC) - CB41, Dec 12, 09:34:26
- Yes. Total disgrace. Arrogant and smug. (n/m) (NCFC) - Pit, Dec 12, 09:47:03
- Bit over the top.. (NCFC) - loz, Dec 12, 09:35:30
- tbf lambert was a C*** when he managed us, just we didnt care about it then (NCFC) - ChengdeCanary, Dec 12, 09:43:34
- who knows quite how bad the injuries to Wes and Tettey are (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 12, 09:23:09
- Injured or not, surely it's still a 'weakened team' without 5 first choice players? (n/m) (NCFC) - mr chimp, Dec 12, 09:36:03
- Yes.He could have played Garrido and Turner. That would have made the back 4 much firmer. (n/m) (NCFC) - Pit, Dec 12, 09:28:47
- haha. Turner only trained yesterday for the first time I think? (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 12, 09:30:28
- I guess it just seemed that way. It was a weakened team but not by choice then. (NCFC) - Pit, Dec 12, 09:31:58
- haha. Turner only trained yesterday for the first time I think? (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 12, 09:30:28
- interesting that you say ruddy is a hard act to follow (NCFC) - doncoop, Dec 12, 09:21:19
- "Lambert and Culverhouse were a disgrace - giving it large after the goals and afterwards" (NCFC) - CB41, Dec 12, 09:34:26
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.