Sorry mate but disagree
I'd love to move around during games but sadly this new system doesn't allow it anyway. What it allows is for you to stand amongst like minded individuals who want to really get behind the team for 90 mins without all this sit down stand up crap we have now. It removes the danger of toppling over into the next row and avoids bruises on knees and ankles as you jump around when a goal is scored. To get the feeling of the old days we surge along the row at the moment which can be just a tad dangerous but a bit of fun all the same.
CCTV will still pick out individuals as you're still effectively in rows and you'll still have a ST with customer number etc so any misbehaving and McNasty will soon have you banned.
Bring it on.
Posted By: Old Splat on December 11th 2012 at 15:40:29
Message Thread
- Oh. Not us backing Safe Standing trial, apparently (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 11, 14:58:28
- I think this would be a massive step backwards (NCFC) - UtterlyHuckerby, Dec 11, 15:05:34
- Sorry mate but disagree (NCFC) - Old Splat, Dec 11, 15:40:29
- you cant move around with safe standing (n/m) (NCFC) - grants_cold_finger, Dec 11, 15:14:59
- Shame (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Splat, Dec 11, 15:01:52
- wouldn't clubs lose money with it? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 11, 15:00:47
- safe standing basically has the same number in as if seats... (NCFC) - Pixelman, Dec 11, 15:27:24
- That's wrong though. (NCFC) - Yellalee, Dec 11, 15:34:24
- That's what I thought, but then why is Dortmund's capacity is reduced by 15000 (n/m) (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Dec 11, 15:28:55
- Why? Surely you'd make more. (n/m) (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Dec 11, 15:02:08
- think cos the standing areas much cheaper (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 11, 15:03:54
- surely that's the club's choice? (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 11, 15:05:05
- standing just always been cheaper i think (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 11, 15:06:28
- just because it used to be, doesn't mean it would need to be in the future, at all. (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 11, 15:07:03
- that is of course true (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 11, 15:11:16
- just because it used to be, doesn't mean it would need to be in the future, at all. (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 11, 15:07:03
- standing just always been cheaper i think (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 11, 15:06:28
- surely that's the club's choice? (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 11, 15:05:05
- think cos the standing areas much cheaper (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 11, 15:03:54
- why would they? (Probably being dense here...) (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 11, 15:01:35
- I'd pay the same as current ST price to stand (NCFC) - Old Splat, Dec 11, 15:06:23
- dunno but dortmund said they'd make more without it (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 11, 15:03:19
- probably charge less for standing (NCFC) - duke of york, Dec 11, 15:10:55
- Maybe the effort of constantly converting back and forth for the Champions League? (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Dec 11, 15:04:40
- safe standing basically has the same number in as if seats... (NCFC) - Pixelman, Dec 11, 15:27:24
- I think this would be a massive step backwards (NCFC) - UtterlyHuckerby, Dec 11, 15:05:34
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.