For Ben-potentially libellous statements

published on a website. I dont think that you are right look at User Posted Link which gives details of a case against the Times which published a potentially libellous statement both in its newspaper and on its website. They were sued and the Court held that the one year limitation period for libel did not apply to libel published on the web. I still think you should at the very least publish a disclaimer - you will precedents if you use Google UK to search " libellous statements published on a website".
Ben I am only trying to help.

Posted By: Westfields1 on November 1st 2005 at 08:24:09

Message Thread

For Ben-potentially libellous statements (NCFC) - Westfields1, Nov 1, 08:24:09
- I think the main difference is that I'm not publishing articles... (NCFC) - Ben, Nov 1, 08:46:21

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.