Not really
we're missing any semblance of attacking threat. Pilks might as well not be there, Johnson is way too deep, Snod slow and weak so far, Wes totally anonymous, and Holt isolated.
We need to pick it up massively and drive forward a bit.
Posted By: duke of york on November 24th 2012 at 16:01:58
Message Thread
- We're missing Turner (NCFC) - NJ_Canary, Nov 24, 15:56:16
- Not really (NCFC) - duke of york, Nov 24, 16:01:58
- I dont think so (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Nov 24, 15:59:36
- Why Bennett for Pilks? I'd go Bennett for Snod (n/m) (NCFC) - Drew Peacock, Nov 24, 16:01:18
- Because at least Snod is getting on the ball (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Nov 24, 16:02:23
- Snod dreadful, Whittaker getting no support (n/m) (NCFC) - NJ_Canary, Nov 24, 16:03:03
- Because at least Snod is getting on the ball (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Nov 24, 16:02:23
- Why Bennett for Pilks? I'd go Bennett for Snod (n/m) (NCFC) - Drew Peacock, Nov 24, 16:01:18
- We're also missing Russell Martin. (n/m) (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Nov 24, 15:58:33
- Nope! (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Nov 24, 15:58:20
- I did honest!! (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Nov 24, 15:57:40
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.