More likely to be for constructive dismissal - Wrath of the Barclay

More likely to be for constructive dismissal

He quit. So can't be for wrongful dismissal since he was the one to terminate the contract. He could claim constructive dismissal though.

Posted By: Tony Martin on October 4th 2012 at 20:26:35

Message Thread

Lambert taking us to tribunal for wrongful dismissal (n/m) (NCFC) - Mozzer, Oct 4, 20:22:20
- good luck with that one! (NCFC) - ingi, Oct 4, 20:31:25
  - Can an employment tribunal awards costs? (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Oct 4, 20:33:24
    - yes if the Employment Tribunal feel it was a non-valid claim (NCFC) - ingi, Oct 4, 20:37:28
- Was he sacked for saying "listen" too many times? (n/m) (NCFC) - UtterlyHuckerby, Oct 4, 20:28:52
- More likely to be for constructive dismissal (NCFC) - Tony Martin, Oct 4, 20:26:35
  - Yes, that makes some sense. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Oct 4, 20:28:19
    - Depends what was in his contract, I suppose (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Oct 4, 20:32:31
    - Indeed. What a grade A **** (n/m) (NCFC) - Tony Martin, Oct 4, 20:29:04
- how the feck does that work? (n/m) (NCFC) - grants_cold_finger, Oct 4, 20:25:11
  - no ideal, club saying he resigned 3 hours after stating (NCFC) - Mozzer, Oct 4, 20:27:58
- What the living fuck?! (n/m) (NCFC) - RootunTootunHootun, Oct 4, 20:24:54
- ??? (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Oct 4, 20:23:38
  - news coming out of fan forum (n/m) (NCFC) - Mozzer, Oct 4, 20:25:02

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.