Jackson and Tettey
Don't understand why everyone is creaming themselves about how good jackson was, he got in a couple of good positions but couldn't finish. The one at the far post should have been put away and the volley should have been on target. He did well to nearly put away the offside one but don't know why he was falling over, if he'd stayed on his feet it would've been a straightforward finish.
We looked better going forward with holt and Moro. I'd start with them next week without the racist chelski could be vulnerable in the air.
Also on Tettey, everyone going on about how good he lookd and how tight he got ton their midfield. The latter was because we had an extra midfielder as we were hanging onto a 5-1 defeat. To me his passing and control looked suspect and I wouldn't be calling for him to be in on the basis of that. Johnson was immense against qpr, spurs and west ham.
Posted By: Kangol Canary on September 30th 2012 at 09:21:48
Message Thread
- Jackson and Tettey (NCFC) - Kangol Canary, Sep 30, 09:21:48
- Tetteys control was awful (n/m) (NCFC) - Hulk Rules, Sep 30, 11:53:02
- Johnson seems to play a few decent games then go off the boil for months (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Sep 30, 09:29:30
- Johnson works hard that I don't doubt.... (NCFC) - Taxi 4 Johnson, Sep 30, 09:24:31
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.