Suddenly offering Lambert 30,000 a week doesn't seem such bad value.
Limiting our wages to 15,000 has probably cost us our premiership status
Posted By: John in Texas on September 29th 2012 at 16:39:08
Message Thread
- Suddenly offering Lambert 30,000 a week doesn't seem such bad value. (NCFC) - John in Texas, Sep 29, 16:39:08
- ? (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Sep 29, 16:41:58
- Lambert left because we didn't want to break our 15k a week 'rule'. Expensive mistake (n/m) (NCFC) - John in Texas, Sep 29, 16:43:40
- and you know this how? (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Sep 29, 16:45:13
- McNally stated there was a 15k limit on wages. (n/m) (NCFC) - John in Texas, Sep 29, 16:48:31
- He also stated that no such thing was in place (n/m) (NCFC) - Huge Small, Sep 29, 16:50:10
- so you've put 2 and 2 together then? (NCFC) - Charles21, Sep 29, 16:49:30
- and why would he do that? (n/m) (NCFC) - John in Texas, Sep 29, 16:51:09
- bigger club (NCFC) - Charles21, Sep 29, 16:58:19
- and why would he do that? (n/m) (NCFC) - John in Texas, Sep 29, 16:51:09
- McNally stated there was a 15k limit on wages. (n/m) (NCFC) - John in Texas, Sep 29, 16:48:31
- and you know this how? (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Sep 29, 16:45:13
- Lambert left because we didn't want to break our 15k a week 'rule'. Expensive mistake (n/m) (NCFC) - John in Texas, Sep 29, 16:43:40
- ? (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Sep 29, 16:41:58
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.