i understand the call for Wes but I really think
we're more solid defensively with the midfield we have
Posted By: South_West_Canary on September 15th 2012 at 14:52:53
Message Thread
- My thoughts (NCFC) - Kev, Sep 15, 14:51:28
- Could you provide some stats to the traditionally starts slow thing (n/m) (NCFC) - Dandy Highburyman, Sep 15, 14:56:18
- And Benno and Whitakker. (NCFC) - bullsch, Sep 15, 14:55:09
- i understand the call for Wes but I really think (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Sep 15, 14:52:53
- yes we are but that 2nd half was crying out for him. I'm all for being more solid (NCFC) - Sugbad The Bad, Sep 15, 14:57:38
- win one lose one = 3 points; draw both = 2 points (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Sep 15, 15:23:34
- But we're not winning and we didn't look like winning v Coo Pea Arrr of Spam (n/m) (NCFC) - Dandy Highburyman, Sep 15, 14:56:50
- True; but it was clear with 20 minutes to go we'd lost our way (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Sep 15, 14:56:50
- maybe, but maybe would have lost it one nil (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Sep 15, 14:58:16
- Well, we nearly gifted it to them in that time anyway... (n/m) (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Sep 15, 15:03:13
- 38 (NCFC) - Sugbad The Bad, Sep 15, 14:59:50
- lol (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Sep 15, 15:01:54
- maybe, but maybe would have lost it one nil (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Sep 15, 14:58:16
- yes we are but that 2nd half was crying out for him. I'm all for being more solid (NCFC) - Sugbad The Bad, Sep 15, 14:57:38
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.