I suspect

that a large majority of people think that although there's nothing wrong in principle with a test based on permissible "reasonable force", there's a good deal wrong with what appears to be the typical application of that rule, resulting too often in the punishment of homeowners whose property and lives were forcibly invaded. Of course the police always need to investigate whether the owner has acted wholly disproportionately, but in my view his acts ought to be presumed lawful within a very broad spectrum.

Posted By: paulg on September 5th 2012 at 10:42:45


Message Thread


Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.

Log in