like no dempsey for fulham was a result?

Sometimes it matters, sometimes it doesn't.

You could argue that their play would have been more predictable with him in the team and therefore we may have been able to counter it more effectively.

Whoever plays for them and us, lets just hope for the 3 points!

Posted By: doncoop on September 5th 2012 at 08:49:56

Message Thread

RESULT - no Carroll on Sat week........link! (NCFC) - Kirrie, Sep 5, 08:46:35
- wwII (n/m) (NCFC) - Chris Peacock, Sep 5, 09:00:52
  - Ah but you din't have a link, it was just your say so! (n/m) (NCFC) - Kirrie, Sep 5, 09:02:38
    - My word is gospel. (NCFC) - Chris Peacock, Sep 5, 09:07:43
- like no dempsey for fulham was a result? (NCFC) - doncoop, Sep 5, 08:49:56
  - Yeah, I guess we don't have a clue how West Ham, managed by Sam Allardyce, will play now.. (n/m) (NCFC) - bjg123, Sep 5, 09:31:07
    - Colin, you look like a halfwit (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Sep 5, 09:32:16
  - Think Carroll is more central to the Allardyce style than Dempsey was to Fulham's? (n/m) (NCFC) - Kirrie, Sep 5, 09:03:30
    - We are playing West Ham (NCFC) - Jim, Sep 5, 09:30:55
    - true, would have made them more predictable though (n/m) (NCFC) - doncoop, Sep 5, 09:06:18

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.