David Bentley had hardly played for Arsenal

when we signed him and he was meant to be our saviour. I'm quite excited about Kane - young, very highly-rated England prospect. Rather that than all those older strikers knocking about who have proved they're not quite good enough for the Prem

Posted By: duke of york on September 1st 2012 at 10:56:30

Message Thread

David Bentley had hardly played for Arsenal (NCFC) - duke of york, Sep 1, 10:56:30
- The difference this time is Kane is not signed as our saviour, but as backup for Holt (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Sep 1, 11:05:05
  - we need the finished article not some kid. (n/m) (NCFC) - private pike, Sep 1, 11:09:23
    - Why? and Who? Finished Article Premiership Striker... do we have that dosh? (NCFC) - phrankin, Sep 1, 11:29:25
  - Which is good isn't it? (NCFC) - duke of york, Sep 1, 11:06:03
    - oh yes absolutely. (NCFC) - phrankin, Sep 1, 11:08:16
- Are you pleased? (n/m) (NCFC) - Dandy Highburyman, Sep 1, 10:59:46
  - Yes (NCFC) - duke of york, Sep 1, 11:01:23
    - Can you state that in your post and also say that you're pleased too... (NCFC) - Dandy Highburyman, Sep 1, 11:03:08
      - I am pleased (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Sep 1, 11:05:04

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.