Playing budget, not transfer budget
It still amazes me how many fans think of football clubs outgoings primarily in terms of transfer fees, when wages are are far bigger factor (example: why don't we buy Berbatov for ?5m, we could afford that).
We had loads of players last year who proved they were Premiership quality players by comfortably staying up, so they'll all have got whopping great pay rises I suspect. So that's most of the extra budget gone without any new players.
Posted By: mr carra on August 31st 2012 at 14:23:47
Message Thread
- Transfer Budget.... (NCFC) - South Coast Canary, Aug 31, 14:01:55
- In fattie's pocket due to new contract (n/m) (NCFC) - Pragmatist, Aug 31, 14:45:43
- Playing budget, not transfer budget (NCFC) - mr carra, Aug 31, 14:23:47
- I've never understood why our fans have made such a big deal out of this (NCFC) - Klobo04, Aug 31, 14:18:34
- wages for new signings + Holt & Surman new contracts (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Aug 31, 14:12:58
- We had the biggest "football budget" in the clubs history (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 31, 14:05:43
- Don't forget however much we paid Blues for Hootun (n/m) (NCFC) - lurd, Aug 31, 14:06:19
- 1. Wages, 2. January (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Aug 31, 14:03:27
- Wages. The likes of Bassonf, Tettey, Turner etc would be on a fair whack (n/m) (NCFC) - earlydoors, Aug 31, 14:03:26
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.