Have you considered that it was because we didn't have the ability to hold the ball up... - Wrath of the Barclay

Have you considered that it was because we didn't have the ability to hold the ball up...

Meaning that as soon as it was cleared by the back four, it was coming straight back?

Posted By: Brom on August 30th 2012 at 14:22:43

Message Thread

Excuse me but... (NCFC) - CROMAGZ, Aug 30, 14:21:11
- Lost count how many times the ball was played up to Holt and it just came straight back (n/m) (NCFC) - RootunTootunHootun, Aug 30, 14:33:04
  - CMS P/Ex For 1R? (NCFC) - Martin Peters, Aug 30, 14:36:58
- 1 up front IS very negative tho isnt it? (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Aug 30, 14:24:46
  - It depends who the wingers are (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Aug 30, 14:27:10
  - All the top teams play 1 up front these days. (NCFC) - lurd, Aug 30, 14:26:28
    - Didn't Italy play 4-4-2 in Euro Championships? (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Aug 30, 14:28:02
  - depends how far up the park your two wingers get (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Aug 30, 14:26:25
  - Chelsea play one up front (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Aug 30, 14:26:24
  - Not really, especially if one of the 2 is fox and two of three 3 push forward (n/m) (NCFC) - CROMAGZ, Aug 30, 14:26:08
- Ball retention was the problem (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Aug 30, 14:24:17
- Have you considered that it was because we didn't have the ability to hold the ball up... (NCFC) - Brom, Aug 30, 14:22:43
  - We had more possession than Fulham (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Aug 30, 14:25:06
    - But where was that possession? (NCFC) - Brom, Aug 30, 14:28:04
      - Agreed (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Aug 30, 14:29:30
  - so you're suggesting perhaps 4-3-3 or-3-4-3? (n/m) (NCFC) - CROMAGZ, Aug 30, 14:24:03

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.