No, of course not - not at the wages Malky & Iwan would presumably have been on

But it left the team devoid of natural leaders - hard to quantify but I think it counted for *enough* when the going got tough (about 6 or 7 games in) and then even tougher (post Xmas). Malky also had the knack of scoring the odd important goal. Not the only thing that went wrong last season; but I'd suggest it was a fairly significant factor.

We're still suffering too, although I hear Hughes is filling the role to some extent (whatever doubts there are over his ability)

Posted By: BerlinCanary on October 25th 2005 at 20:58:26

Message Thread

quote from sky sports reporter (NCFC) - brianguthrysluvchild, Oct 25, 20:27:26
- Letting Malky go (NCFC) - caffrey, Oct 25, 20:30:54
  - Not talking about playing him in the prem (NCFC) - brianguthrysluvchild, Oct 25, 21:17:10
    - He'd be another year older (NCFC) - caffrey, Oct 25, 21:22:52
  - I certainly agreed at the time - it released cash for incoming players (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Oct 25, 20:41:07
    - Yo Psycho (NCFC) - Suggy, Oct 25, 20:55:31
      - Oh, yeah, not sure if it was the same one though (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Oct 25, 21:02:17
        
        The one I posted.... (NCFC) - Suggy, Oct 25, 21:12:08
        
        No that answer never crossed my mind - phew! (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Oct 25, 21:22:26
    - Agree (NCFC) - caffrey, Oct 25, 20:46:16
      - No, of course not - not at the wages Malky & Iwan would presumably have been on (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Oct 25, 20:58:26
        
        Yooze (NCFC) - Suggy, Oct 25, 21:04:00
  - Yep, I'd go with that. Sad to say, but there you are. (n/m) (NCFC) - Suggy, Oct 25, 20:33:50

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.