not over the moon about Holt's new contract tbh
the guy spat his dummy out and got what he wanted in the end, so it would appear.
I wouldn't be surprised if other players demanded an improved contract now and i wouldn't blame them either. If we were to be relegated in two seasons, we would be paying with a 33 year old striker on 30K [guess] a week in the championship.
otbc.
Posted By: ingi on July 3rd 2012 at 19:18:15
Message Thread
- not over the moon about Holt's new contract tbh (NCFC) - ingi, Jul 3, 19:18:15
- He'd made it clear he'd wanted to stay at Norwich from the start to be fair. (NCFC) - tim berry, Jul 3, 19:41:29
- In the end he got what he deserved (NCFC) - phrankin, Jul 3, 19:32:36
- Gotta be some sort of relegation clause in there (NCFC) - RootunTootunHootun, Jul 3, 19:27:03
- SO agree (NCFC) - Pragmatist, Jul 3, 19:23:48
- He might be. With a relegation clause though. (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Jul 3, 19:44:17
- Yebbut, would you have been happy seeing him play against us before Xmas? (n/m) (NCFC) - Sugbad The Bad, Jul 3, 19:19:03
- surely there is a relegation clause (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jul 3, 19:20:09
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.