I think that Fryatt is a more natural striker that Chris Martin

Fryatt makes a lot of runs whether it be into the channels or behind the opposition's defence, Martin tends to play deeper and gets involved in the start of more moves. Both are essentially just good champs players in essence, regardless of differences.

Posted By: Common Sense Police on April 23rd 2012 at 21:33:15

Message Thread

that waghorn is a decent player, played well at ours last year. (Other Football) - protheroe fitzgibbon, Apr 23, 21:15:48
- He's generally a hard worker but has very limited ability (Other Football) - Common Sense Police, Apr 23, 21:22:01
  - fryatt's a tidy player, good finisher but lacks a yard of pace, a bit chris martin. (n/m) (Other Football) - protheroe fitzgibbon, Apr 23, 21:26:29
    - I think that Fryatt is a more natural striker that Chris Martin (Other Football) - Common Sense Police, Apr 23, 21:33:15
      - thats true enough, though in martins case he generally would'nt come deep (Other Football) - protheroe fitzgibbon, Apr 23, 21:38:45
        
        *runs* ffs. (n/m) (Other Football) - protheroe fitzgibbon, Apr 23, 21:39:15
    - *like* (n/m) (Other Football) - protheroe fitzgibbon, Apr 23, 21:26:57

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.