So how can Lawrenson be so definitive about Holt?

He's the second highest English goalscorer doesn't this make him the second best striker? If not what other criteria is used to judge a striker? Would Lawrenson be so certain if those 14 goals had been scored while Holt was a Spurs player or Arsenal etc.? It's just the smug arrogant way in which he writes off a players chances of playing for his country, a player who would jump at the chance and play with the same commitment and passion he plays for his Club.

Posted By: Chopper on April 7th 2012 at 23:31:57


Message Thread


Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.

Log in