Surman's goal was hardly a 'stunner' either
Posted By: King on February 5th 2012 at 13:56:03
Message Thread
- Lovely old ignorance... (NCFC) - woody, Feb 5, 13:25:51
- Surman's goal was hardly a 'stunner' either (n/m) (NCFC) - King, Feb 5, 13:56:03
- He took it very well (n/m) (NCFC) - 51eve, Feb 5, 14:09:44
- ha - Daniel who? (n/m) (NCFC) - Karnivore, Feb 5, 13:41:57
- Shit - I missed that one too! Reckon they must've done it for a bet. (n/m) (NCFC) - woody, Feb 5, 13:49:52
- they did his twice FFS ;-) (n/m) (NCFC) - Karnivore, Feb 5, 13:53:26
- Shit - I missed that one too! Reckon they must've done it for a bet. (n/m) (NCFC) - woody, Feb 5, 13:49:52
- Jeez, the guy has his name on his shirt FFS!! (NCFC) - Sugbad The Bad, Feb 5, 13:29:59
- Saw the Ruddy one's yesterday (yep, 2 in the same piece) & repeated in Torygraph so (NCFC) - woody, Feb 5, 13:39:08
- Surman's goal was hardly a 'stunner' either (n/m) (NCFC) - King, Feb 5, 13:56:03
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.