Because there's very little point in what's said. If Russell Martin punched the ball in

net, Lambert would never be draw on the incident. If the opposition punched the ball in the net, Lambert would hope a referee or the authorities would see sense and deal with it

Repeat, match after match

Posted By: pants on February 1st 2012 at 23:28:49

Message Thread

What did lambert say? I missed it. (n/m) (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Feb 1, 23:13:43
- Second best all evening, better team won (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Feb 1, 23:15:00
  - I guess that's why I never listen to manager interviews (NCFC) - pants, Feb 1, 23:17:25
    - He also said we did ok to start then they scored and got a foothold (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Feb 1, 23:21:38
      - If I had my way, Culverhouse would do all the interviews (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 1, 23:24:03
        
        Why? (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Feb 1, 23:24:42
        
        Because there's very little point in what's said. If Russell Martin punched the ball in (NCFC) - pants, Feb 1, 23:28:49
        
        Get with it Pants. Lambert says and does the right things. (n/m) (NCFC) - Daryl Hutch, Feb 1, 23:55:01
        
        Suck my arse (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 2, 00:01:56
        
        I like that. (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Feb 1, 23:33:49
        
        Deffo, which is why I'd have it that way (NCFC) - pants, Feb 1, 23:38:33
  - Thanks! Fair enough (n/m) (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Feb 1, 23:17:08

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.