No evidence that it was anything other than guff.

Although to be fair, my guff tolerance levels are quite low, so any evidence would have to be pretty authoritatively sourced for me to consider it notguff. I.e., Direct qutage from Langberts, McBarstard, Bowkett, &c.

Posted By: Arizona Bay on February 1st 2012 at 10:38:18

Message Thread

Just wondered - was there actually any evidence that we tried for Rhodes yesterday? (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Feb 1, 10:33:34
- No evidence that it was anything other than guff. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Feb 1, 10:38:18
  - yep. Couldn't actually remember whether there was anything of any substance to it (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Feb 1, 10:39:22
    - Hudds have stated categorically he wasn't going until the summer (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 1, 10:40:57
      - right (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Feb 1, 10:43:17
- of ffs let it go (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Feb 1, 10:34:06
  - Good advice, you're an example to us all about moving on (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 1, 10:39:48
  - go away troll. After sensible replies here. (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Feb 1, 10:34:55
    - well does it fuckin matter anyway.jesus (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Feb 1, 10:35:44
      - I know, some people need to get a bit of perspective (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 1, 10:41:07
        
        Reminds me why Selwyn is on ignore (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 1, 11:54:11

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.