Wasn't my argument, you brought it up originally

that they were doing worse under Pearson. They clearly aren't. Also when did I say they were a top champs side? I said they had a good squad and are HARD TO BEAT. Never once did I make them out to be a high quality side, never once did I say that they've made 'vast' improvements, just that Pearson has made improvements to the side and that in turn has made them a lot harder to beat.

I say a team is fulfilling their potential under a new manager and are becoming tough to beat, therefore our cup game with them won't be easy and COULD go to a replay, because, once again, they are hard to beat. You translate this to mean I think Leicester are brilliant, full of quality and might turn us over. Far reaching much?

You say my points are weak (they're not, they're facts), yet you're mainly arguing against a point that I didn't even make! I suggest you look through my posts again as you have made a major misunderstanding. I like you USAC, but you're are totally missing the point. If I said that it was as tough to beat Stoke as it was to beat Arsenal, would that mean that Stoke had as much quality as Arsenal and should be as high in the league? Of course not, but they're still as hard to beat.

My whole point is that Leicester are tough to beat and this tie could go to a replay, that's it. There's nothing more to it than that.

Posted By: Common Sense Police on January 29th 2012 at 20:35:12

Message Thread

Don't expect the Leicester game to be a walkover (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Jan 29, 16:49:51
- Couldnt you have said the same thing about Burnley? (NCFC) - usacanary, Jan 29, 17:37:58
  - Have Burnley had a change in manager recently? (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Jan 29, 17:48:59
    - Huh? Burnley are above them and Howe has only been there a year. (NCFC) - usacanary, Jan 29, 18:02:20
      - League position doesn't indicate how tough a team are to beat (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Jan 29, 18:10:49
        
        So you are saying League position is no indicator of quality..... (NCFC) - usacanary, Jan 29, 18:37:21
        
        Did I mention quality being irrelavent to league position? (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Jan 29, 18:59:01
        
        Also need to point out that their points per game ratio HAS improved under Pearson (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Jan 29, 19:18:26
        
        I think most of your arguments are weak at best. (NCFC) - usacanary, Jan 29, 20:14:39
        
        Wasn't my argument, you brought it up originally (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Jan 29, 20:35:12
    - Sorry, that should be lost 7 from 14 previous to playing us (n/m) (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Jan 29, 17:50:08
- Oh. Forgot about the Nugent factor. He WILL score. (NCFC) - col canary, Jan 29, 17:04:21
- A good thing about PL is that he won't be underestimating them (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Man, Jan 29, 17:01:20
- nice that they have 4 games before to our 3 (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 29, 16:58:17
  - Hopefully they believe that they can make the p.o's this year (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Jan 29, 17:02:42
- We'll destroy them (NCFC) - Huge Small, Jan 29, 16:53:26
  - I hope so (n/m) (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Jan 29, 16:55:02
- they have nothing for us to be that scared of (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Jan 29, 16:52:57
  - Paul Gallagher (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 29, 17:01:24
    - lol (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Jan 29, 17:04:20
  - Not saying we should be scared, just that it will be a tough game (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Jan 29, 16:54:44
    - ok, cheers (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Jan 29, 16:55:37
  - drew 1-1 (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jan 29, 16:54:20

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.