Would we have kept a clean sheet without his pressurising of Chelsea's defence?
No Holt means more time on the ball for the Chelsea defenders and therefore more space to create attacks from. Sure, Holt is more likely to score or create against a tired defence, but I'll take 0-0 over 1-2.
Posted By: Common Sense Police on January 21st 2012 at 15:50:27
Message Thread
- Holt was excellent today but.......... (NCFC) - usacanary, Jan 21, 15:44:56
- Would we have kept a clean sheet without his pressurising of Chelsea's defence? (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Jan 21, 15:50:27
- True, but at the expense of being out on his feet in the last 15-20 mins (NCFC) - usacanary, Jan 21, 16:00:27
- A question you often ask, who could we afford that's good enough? (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Jan 21, 16:06:27
- I think players are out there who we could afford....... (NCFC) - usacanary, Jan 21, 16:25:04
- I agree that we need another option but I'd still rather start Holt as often as possible (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Jan 21, 16:35:20
- I think players are out there who we could afford....... (NCFC) - usacanary, Jan 21, 16:25:04
- i thought holt was epic for the whole 90mins today.... (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Jan 21, 16:03:35
- A question you often ask, who could we afford that's good enough? (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Jan 21, 16:06:27
- True, but at the expense of being out on his feet in the last 15-20 mins (NCFC) - usacanary, Jan 21, 16:00:27
- Would we have kept a clean sheet without his pressurising of Chelsea's defence? (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Jan 21, 15:50:27
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.