No I'd say the only way we could have got rid of him would either be because his injury

means he won't be back for a while, or if there was a clause such as that if he missed x games through injury then we could send him back. Or maybe there was a recall clause from Manure if we didn't play him x percent of the time (let's face it, Manure have a bit of an injury crisis at the moment).

I'm pretty sure you cannot just decide to send back a season long loan just so you can get another one.

Posted By: Steve in Holland on January 18th 2012 at 17:15:34

Message Thread

Here's a question... (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Jan 18, 17:11:51
- I think we have to pay yes... (NCFC) - loz, Jan 18, 17:23:05
  - who cares? we're fucking loaded (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 18, 17:35:16
- Clause in contract - same as kyle's. (n/m) (NCFC) - Shut the gate, Jan 18, 17:18:10
- No I'd say the only way we could have got rid of him would either be because his injury (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 18, 17:15:34
  - Don't see why not if... (NCFC) - loz, Jan 18, 17:24:29

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.