thank f**k for free speech then!!!!

naughts in the first few games was flying forward and wasnt getting any cover.... So although not necessarily his fault but if he knows theres no cover then its a risky tactic to leave us exposed......

I think culverhouse has had a word as naughts runs seem better judged recently...

Posted By: Cheltenham_Canary on January 1st 2012 at 10:28:46

Message Thread

Fucking hell we're trying to sort out a permanent deal for Naughts this month (NCFC) - Duck, Jan 1, 10:18:21
- yeah he was.... (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Jan 1, 10:22:17
  - i've never criticised naughts (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 1, 10:23:10
    - Me neither (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 1, 10:25:04
      - thank fuck for free speech then!!!! (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Jan 1, 10:28:46
- defo signing (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 1, 10:20:42
  - Defoe? (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 1, 10:26:57
    - most important is a box to box midfielder (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 1, 10:30:29
    - I`m convinced Surman could play the Wes role (n/m) (NCFC) - emmaroyds, Jan 1, 10:30:25
      - WASH YOUR FUCKING MOUTH OUT. NO ONE PUTS WESSI IN THE CORNER (n/m) (NCFC) - Dandy Highburyman, Jan 1, 11:11:35
      - I'm not (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 1, 11:11:00
      - we can't sell wes ffs (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 1, 10:31:07
        
        anything is possible (n/m) (NCFC) - emmaroyds, Jan 1, 10:31:42

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.