Yeah I loved Hucks and he pretty much won us that league
but what I mean is, not explained it very well, Hoolahan is TECHNICALLY the better player
Hucks was amazing but he was just pace and dribbling. With the ball at his feet, Hoolahan is technically better than Hucks.
just nice that we've had enough quality players to be able to have this debate
Posted By: Only1Doherty on December 10th 2011 at 19:13:46
Message Thread
- Who do you love more...Hoolahan or Holt? (NCFC) - Only1Doherty, Dec 10, 18:51:23
- Bold statement about Hooly . . . (NCFC) - A1an5, Dec 10, 18:59:05
- I only started going around 96 so I've only really seen Eadie/Bellamy/Hucks/Ashton (NCFC) - Only1Doherty, Dec 10, 19:03:09
- Ahhh I see. (NCFC) - A1an5, Dec 10, 19:19:44
- Have to agree with the Dean Ashton view but would also (NCFC) - Beaver Las Vegas, Dec 10, 19:07:53
- I only started going around 96 so I've only really seen Eadie/Bellamy/Hucks/Ashton (NCFC) - Only1Doherty, Dec 10, 19:03:09
- love Hoolahoop but what about Hucks ? (NCFC) - Kar1, Dec 10, 18:54:26
- Hucks was good but Hoolahan technically different class I think (n/m) (NCFC) - Only1Doherty, Dec 10, 18:55:47
- I want what you've been having. . . (NCFC) - A1an5, Dec 10, 19:10:49
- Yeah I loved Hucks and he pretty much won us that league (NCFC) - Only1Doherty, Dec 10, 19:13:46
- Different players yes. . (NCFC) - A1an5, Dec 10, 19:22:54
- Maybe Im just getting too excited watching this team and forgetting the past (NCFC) - Only1Doherty, Dec 10, 19:24:36
- Maybe but we can all forgive that . . . (NCFC) - A1an5, Dec 10, 19:29:32
- Maybe Im just getting too excited watching this team and forgetting the past (NCFC) - Only1Doherty, Dec 10, 19:24:36
- For instance Iwan was class because of his goals but technically he was a poor player (n/m) (NCFC) - Only1Doherty, Dec 10, 19:14:52
- Agreed Iwan was all strength and heading ability. (NCFC) - A1an5, Dec 10, 19:27:36
- Different players yes. . (NCFC) - A1an5, Dec 10, 19:22:54
- Yeah I loved Hucks and he pretty much won us that league (NCFC) - Only1Doherty, Dec 10, 19:13:46
- I suppose they are different players (NCFC) - Kar1, Dec 10, 18:59:15
- I want what you've been having. . . (NCFC) - A1an5, Dec 10, 19:10:49
- Hucks was good but Hoolahan technically different class I think (n/m) (NCFC) - Only1Doherty, Dec 10, 18:55:47
- I love Lambert (n/m) (NCFC) - Beaver Las Vegas, Dec 10, 18:54:21
- holt for me (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 10, 18:53:18
- Can't decide. They are both sexual. And martin. And tierney. (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Dec 10, 18:52:06
- what if you had to choose? I'd go Hoolahan I think (n/m) (NCFC) - Only1Doherty, Dec 10, 18:53:00
- Holt for the reach-around. (n/m) (NCFC) - tudders, Dec 10, 18:54:37
- Hoolahoop is the best in my book, just a tiny bit ahead of Holt, tiny tiny bit. (n/m) (NCFC) - DrDublin, Dec 10, 18:52:55
- what if you had to choose? I'd go Hoolahan I think (n/m) (NCFC) - Only1Doherty, Dec 10, 18:53:00
- Bold statement about Hooly . . . (NCFC) - A1an5, Dec 10, 18:59:05
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.