Culverhouse...
Always one of the first picks in a best xi (although my first ones are crook and Bowen). But to be honest he was a good but not that brilliant right back. His best performances were always as a sweeper.
Intut ?
Posted By: Steve in Holland on November 18th 2011 at 11:21:40
Message Thread
- Culverhouse... (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Nov 18, 11:21:40
- Controversial but... (NCFC) - dear prudence, Nov 18, 11:32:02
- I was thinking about edworthy to be honest (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Nov 18, 11:51:20
- But culverhouse chosen for his sweeper performances (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Nov 18, 11:51:46
- He was well out of his depth at Prem Level though (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Nov 18, 11:51:10
- Stringer was amazingly consistent, if you go back a bit (NCFC) - Claygate_Canary, Nov 18, 11:38:40
- I was thinking about edworthy to be honest (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Nov 18, 11:51:20
- Controversial but... (NCFC) - dear prudence, Nov 18, 11:32:02
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.