One other thing which is puzzling about the article
Its suggested that we go from 27,000 to 35,000
Yet it says devloping the city stand will add 5,600 seats only (4400 to 10,000)
This only brings us up to 32,600
Not sure where the extra 2400 seats are coming from.
Why not just keep the city stand and add the extra 2400 seats elsewhere?
The numbers just dont add up.
Posted By: usacanary on October 14th 2011 at 23:13:35
Message Thread
- The pinkun article......I have some concerns over some of the McNally comments (NCFC) - usacanary, Oct 14, 22:56:17
- From footballgrounsguide.com re: future development (NCFC) - JD3, Oct 14, 23:40:58
- So the Pinkun article is wrong when it states 10,000 instead of 12,000 (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Oct 15, 00:19:09
- I suppose the money invloved now could eventually make adding to the South Stand worthwhil (NCFC) - Huge Small, Oct 15, 00:03:05
- Also past Bowkett interview: (NCFC) - JD3, Oct 14, 23:42:48
- After today's accounts, I trust him with numbers. He knows his shizzle. (NCFC) - jafski, Oct 14, 23:11:20
- I agree, I dont want to piss on the parade because obviously...... (NCFC) - usacanary, Oct 14, 23:27:06
- That's the gamble which at some point you have to take. (NCFC) - jafski, Oct 14, 23:28:35
- I agree, I dont want to piss on the parade because obviously...... (NCFC) - usacanary, Oct 14, 23:27:06
- Isn't the Jarrold designed to have a second tier added relatively easily (and cheaply)? (NCFC) - JD3, Oct 14, 23:04:39
- No. Not from what i remember (NCFC) - Huge Small, Oct 14, 23:36:27
- Ahaaa, so new City Stand it is then. It's too small as it stands. (n/m) (NCFC) - JD3, Oct 14, 23:38:48
- City stand has the foundations of a much bigger capacity stand (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Oct 14, 23:41:30
- Nope, already been mentioned that it has to come down witha complete rebuild (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Oct 15, 00:18:25
- City stand has the foundations of a much bigger capacity stand (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Oct 14, 23:41:30
- Ahaaa, so new City Stand it is then. It's too small as it stands. (n/m) (NCFC) - JD3, Oct 14, 23:38:48
- One other thing which is puzzling about the article (NCFC) - usacanary, Oct 14, 23:13:35
- Also says 'the main focus' will be developing the City stand, implying expansion elsewhere (NCFC) - jafski, Oct 14, 23:16:29
- If they can expand 2400 seats elsewhere........why not just add those only? (NCFC) - usacanary, Oct 14, 23:20:20
- If we did stick another 8000 seats on (NCFC) - Huge Small, Oct 14, 23:53:27
- Yep, surely an aim is to have one eye on making it accessible and affordable for future ge (NCFC) - Yellalee, Oct 14, 23:56:13
- You're over-analysing this and coming up with the wrong answer I fear. (n/m) (NCFC) - JD3, Oct 14, 23:25:09
- That's his specialty (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Oct 15, 06:24:25
- Like I said. You have to tip your hat to McNasty and trust him with the figures. (NCFC) - jafski, Oct 14, 23:23:16
- If we did stick another 8000 seats on (NCFC) - Huge Small, Oct 14, 23:53:27
- If they can expand 2400 seats elsewhere........why not just add those only? (NCFC) - usacanary, Oct 14, 23:20:20
- Also says 'the main focus' will be developing the City stand, implying expansion elsewhere (NCFC) - jafski, Oct 14, 23:16:29
- No. Not from what i remember (NCFC) - Huge Small, Oct 14, 23:36:27
- From footballgrounsguide.com re: future development (NCFC) - JD3, Oct 14, 23:40:58
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.