That's the thing, for me

If it's for the table I have no problem with it.

If it's for pest control, I also have no problem with it (NB without wishing to start a gayoff, foxes are most certainly vermin whose numbers need controlling but hunting with hounds is certainly not a good way to control their numbers: that's for fun, not for any legitimate reason).

If it's for fun, I believe the appropriate word to be "c**tbeak".

Posted By: Old Man on September 28th 2011 at 16:34:28

Message Thread

Lovely old USA (General Chat) - CB41, Sep 28, 16:02:03
- "Slaughtering things for nothing" (General Chat) - usacanary, Sep 28, 16:37:35
  - How do you train a bear to do that? (General Chat) - Old Man, Sep 28, 16:39:23
    - If you believe Disney, Bears are friendly creatures who enjoy a good tune. (n/m) (General Chat) - usacanary, Sep 28, 16:41:06
      - Not to mention a good handful of fancy ants (n/m) (General Chat) - Old Man, Sep 28, 16:42:06
- They knock bins over (n/m) (General Chat) - UtterlyHuckerby, Sep 28, 16:06:37
- Indeed our much loved royal family is partial to blasting animals out of the skies (General Chat) - Worzel Scrimmage, Sep 28, 16:05:16
  - As is our very own OG although, in the case of game birds I would like to think (General Chat) - CB41, Sep 28, 16:10:54
    - That's the thing, for me (General Chat) - Old Man, Sep 28, 16:34:28
    - tbf many of them are raised for being blasted anyway (General Chat) - Worzel Scrimmage, Sep 28, 16:14:04
      - Indeed and they also are the main reason our moorlands are such (General Chat) - CB41, Sep 28, 16:23:29

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.