bollocks to who and why?

Posted By: Kar1 on September 17th 2011 at 22:11:23

Message Thread

just seen the penalty (NCFC) - Kar1, Sep 17, 22:03:57
- Agree, 99 times out of 100 it would be given (n/m) (NCFC) - N1fty5iftyCity, Sep 17, 22:08:26
  - bollocks (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Sep 17, 22:08:53
    - bollocks to who and why? (n/m) (NCFC) - Kar1, Sep 17, 22:11:23
    - Not like you to be argumentative and down when we win is it? (NCFC) - N1fty5iftyCity, Sep 17, 22:10:42
- Time for our squad to just throw themselves to the ground at every opportunity (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Sep 17, 22:06:47
  - Holt was giving it a decent go to be fair (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Sep 17, 22:21:54
  - lol (n/m) (NCFC) - Daryl Hutch, Sep 17, 22:14:51
  - all at once ? (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Sep 17, 22:08:32
- that didn't even anything up (NCFC) - 1 5CC, Sep 17, 22:06:24
  - who shoudl have been red carded? (n/m) (NCFC) - Kar1, Sep 17, 22:13:37
    - barnett could have gone in the first half (NCFC) - 1 5CC, Sep 17, 22:19:14
      - nah, barely touched him! (n/m) (NCFC) - Kar1, Sep 17, 22:29:42
        
        ROLF (n/m) (NCFC) - 1 5CC, Sep 17, 22:30:41
      - i will watch for that on sky match choice (n/m) (NCFC) - Kar1, Sep 17, 22:20:44
- agree to disagree (NCFC) - Daryl Hutch, Sep 17, 22:05:31
  - It probably was a penalty but would it have been given against Man U? (NCFC) - Kar1, Sep 17, 22:10:48
    - you know the answer to that lol, Kar1 (n/m) (NCFC) - Daryl Hutch, Sep 17, 22:13:11
      - yes, I already know the answer to that one (n/m) (NCFC) - Kar1, Sep 17, 22:16:46
  - tee hee (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Sep 17, 22:08:25
- thats bollocks (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Sep 17, 22:04:34

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.