definite penalty, barnett fukked up
Posted By: SeattleSounders on September 17th 2011 at 16:46:08
Message Thread
- Ok, so let's assume all the Refs got it right on the penalties, then why (NCFC) - Kar1, Sep 17, 16:44:06
- deffo a pen (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Sep 17, 16:47:08
- have you seen it?v havn' but radio Norfolk said it was soft (n/m) (NCFC) - Kar1, Sep 17, 16:48:51
- definite penalty, barnett fukked up (n/m) (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Sep 17, 16:46:08
- wasn't soft (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Man, Sep 17, 16:45:44
- No one on here has complained from the live streams (n/m) (NCFC) - Bezley, Sep 17, 16:44:55
- It was a pen (n/m) (NCFC) - Dandy Highburyman, Sep 17, 16:44:36
- we barely attack (NCFC) - 1 5CC, Sep 17, 16:44:33
- and was a nailed on pen (NCFC) - 1 5CC, Sep 17, 16:45:10
- deffo a pen (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Sep 17, 16:47:08
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.