Video evidence
yes refs need help, particually with the sneaky fouls, dives ect (stoke penalty, Vaugn elbow) but what video evidence would mean is that those players would not even try it on if the knew it would be spotted. I mean would the stoke player have claimed a penalty if video evidence would show it was a tangle outside the box, would the chelsea player have claimed a foul if video evidence showed he was overstretching and going down bbfore the contact.
wouls the WBAplayer have just got up and carried on or the other one not elbow vaugn?
And of course our players would not go down either (not that we get anyhting from it anyway!)
Posted By: Kar1 on September 12th 2011 at 18:20:55
Message Thread
- Video evidence (NCFC) - Kar1, Sep 12, 18:20:55
- Whilst I'm for video evidence (NCFC) - KentonCanary, Sep 12, 18:43:12
- it's obviously a complicated issue (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Sep 12, 18:24:25
- I'd be happy for them to bring it in, could quite easily make it 3 reviews a match (NCFC) - Charles 21 I I, Sep 12, 18:27:25
- it woudl be ina room, there slots iof space under the jarrold stand (NCFC) - Kar1, Sep 12, 18:30:51
- terrible typing, it would be in a room , there is lots of space under the jarrold stand. (n/m) (NCFC) - Kar1, Sep 12, 18:31:55
- it woudl be ina room, there slots iof space under the jarrold stand (NCFC) - Kar1, Sep 12, 18:30:51
- they just need sky TV with sky + (NCFC) - Kar1, Sep 12, 18:27:08
- I'd be happy for them to bring it in, could quite easily make it 3 reviews a match (NCFC) - Charles 21 I I, Sep 12, 18:27:25
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.