Don't see the point of 4 strikers vs no keeper. You can't use all 4 anyway - Wrath of the Barclay

Don't see the point of 4 strikers vs no keeper. You can't use all 4 anyway

Posted By: Steve in Holland on September 11th 2011 at 12:46:55

Message Thread

Subs bench... (NCFC) - Steve Ball Was Good, Sep 11, 12:41:05
- Going for the win, shit or bust (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Sep 11, 12:45:31
  - In Paul we trust OTBC (n/m) (NCFC) - Coventry Yellow, Sep 11, 12:54:45
  - Doesn't make any sense (NCFC) - Steve Ball Was Good, Sep 11, 12:53:27
- I'm scared of the absence of a keeper. That's got to be a risk? (n/m) (NCFC) - Sugbad The Bad, Sep 11, 12:45:05
  - Don't see the point of 4 strikers vs no keeper. You can't use all 4 anyway (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Sep 11, 12:46:55
    - Or maybe one of our outfield subs is a better keeper than the youngster (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Sep 11, 12:47:20
      - Johnson is a big unit (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Sep 11, 12:52:45
      - bit of a worry! (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Sep 11, 12:47:48
  - yep, especially with our record and luck so far! (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Sep 11, 12:46:28
    - and a rookie keeper (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Sep 11, 12:47:01

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.