No other decision really, unless you're in top 4 mode as an official
Posted By: pants on August 27th 2011 at 19:23:24
Message Thread
- Before I go on 606 are we all in agreement Torres should've walked? (n/m) (NCFC) - samcd84, Aug 27, 19:20:29
- Yes he should have done, but so could of Holt (n/m) (NCFC) - Daryl Hutch, Aug 27, 19:33:58
- Holt (NCFC) - emmaroyds, Aug 27, 19:35:38
- he's ipswich scum, thats how. (n/m) (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Aug 27, 20:17:21
- Holt (NCFC) - emmaroyds, Aug 27, 19:35:38
- Could've - yes. Should've - no. The game's gone mad. (n/m) (NCFC) - Sugbad The Bad, Aug 27, 19:26:35
- yes (NCFC) - emmaroyds, Aug 27, 19:23:43
- Absolutely! (n/m) (NCFC) - woody, Aug 27, 19:23:31
- No other decision really, unless you're in top 4 mode as an official (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Aug 27, 19:23:24
- they're often not given when on a yellow (NCFC) - 1 5CC, Aug 27, 19:23:13
- and the first offence was never a booking (NCFC) - 1 5CC, Aug 27, 19:24:47
- yes but fox played well on a yellow at wigan whereas torres was allowed a free tackle 2day (n/m) (NCFC) - samcd84, Aug 27, 19:30:01
- yeah shouldn't have been on a yellow anyway (NCFC) - 1 5CC, Aug 27, 19:32:20
- stop being all reasonable (NCFC) - emmaroyds, Aug 27, 19:27:47
- yes but fox played well on a yellow at wigan whereas torres was allowed a free tackle 2day (n/m) (NCFC) - samcd84, Aug 27, 19:30:01
- and the first offence was never a booking (NCFC) - 1 5CC, Aug 27, 19:24:47
- Yes he should have done, but so could of Holt (n/m) (NCFC) - Daryl Hutch, Aug 27, 19:33:58
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.