Surman never cost us ?1.25 million - Wrath of the Barclay

Surman never cost us ?1.25 million

I thought it was just poor journalism at the time as that was the price Wolves paid Southampton for him

Posted By: grimsbycanary3 on May 27th 2011 at 15:21:24

Message Thread

?2.5m is that for real, ?750k is good but ?2.5m no. (n/m) (NCFC) - Lovely o1d 5ob, May 27, 15:04:02
- I dont agree.......... (NCFC) - usacanary, May 27, 15:23:45
  - oh I like the signing, he's well liked by fans wherever he's been it's was just (NCFC) - Lovely o1d 5ob, May 27, 15:27:54
- agree, well over the top. hopefully a lot less as others suggest (n/m) (NCFC) - 51eve, May 27, 15:07:03
- The ?2.5 will be the maximum fee won't it? (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, May 27, 15:05:32
  - yes, I nearly plopped myself when I saw that. (n/m) (NCFC) - Lovely o1d 5ob, May 27, 15:06:07
    - Didn't bother me at all tbh, it's not my money (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, May 27, 15:08:12
      - fair enough, tis my money though (NCFC) - Brandonio, May 27, 15:16:56
      - exactly how I feel (n/m) (NCFC) - Karnivore, May 27, 15:14:08
        
        Yebbut your a Norwich wannabe, chelskiface. (n/m) (NCFC) - Lovely o1d 5ob, May 27, 15:18:29
        
        lol feck off (n/m) (NCFC) - Karnivore, May 27, 15:26:19
      - plenty more where that came from too (NCFC) - SCC 28, May 27, 15:08:52
  - ^m (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, May 27, 15:06:01
- no chance same as 1.5m surman (NCFC) - SCC 28, May 27, 15:04:28
  - oh good & a good point ref Surman. (n/m) (NCFC) - Lovely o1d 5ob, May 27, 15:05:32
    - he had a 1m option with palace (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, May 27, 15:06:09
      - Surman never cost us ?1.25 million (NCFC) - grimsbycanary3, May 27, 15:21:24

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.