I imogen they will claim the injuction has already been thoroughly broken

It's all over the internet, rendering it meaningless. I don't know if that's a defence in law.

Someone raised an interesting point the other day; if a newspaper hasn't been served with the injuction, which must presumably state exactly who the subjects are, and the fact that there is an injunction is secret, how are they supposed to know not to run the story?

Posted By: Iwan Husarmi on May 22nd 2011 at 10:41:36

Message Thread

The end of superinjunctions or the end of the Sunday Herald? (General Chat) - BerlinCanary, May 22, 10:06:56
- neither - the Herald's editorial says a seperate court order is needed for Scotland (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, May 22, 11:05:38
  - Its bollocks (General Chat) - Klobo04, May 22, 11:46:24
    - The way the media have handled this only goes to prove we needs laws to control them (General Chat) - Ben, May 22, 11:50:15
      - what an odd thing to say (n/m) (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, May 22, 12:02:15
        
        They're told they cannot report something then go right ahead and do it (General Chat) - Ben, May 22, 18:44:54
- Did Giggs really shag Imogen Stubbs? I find that quite hard to believe (n/m) (General Chat) - CB41, May 22, 10:31:04
  - (psst....old fart!) (General Chat) - Iwan Husarmi, May 22, 10:34:49
    - He's not that old, is he? (n/m) (General Chat) - CB41, May 22, 10:40:38
- There is probably some ancient Celtic law (General Chat) - emmaroyds, May 22, 10:12:18
  - I imogen they will claim the injuction has already been thoroughly broken (General Chat) - Iwan Husarmi, May 22, 10:41:36
    - could be worth a read....... (General Chat) - Karnivore, May 22, 10:55:12

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.