The point is they used video evidence to................

change the decision post match.......

If the Ref would have totally missed Rooneys elbow then he would have been banned post match via video evidence.

Because the ref "partially" saw rooney he gets away with it even if video evidence suggests 100% the ref didnt see it clearly (because he would have sent him off)

I dont get the difference between...... didnt see it..... and........ didnt see it clearly.

Thats just me I guess.

Posted By: usacanary on March 22nd 2011 at 19:25:40

Message Thread

hadnt realised - they transferred that booking to ward (NCFC) - jampersands, Mar 22, 17:45:15
- he has to hit 15 for a ban I think (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Mar 22, 18:43:56
  - No....he could still get banned for 10 yellows (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 22, 19:10:10
    - It wouldn`t surprise me if that happened (NCFC) - emmaroyds, Mar 22, 19:14:17
    - One more comment......... (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 22, 19:12:41
      - they didn't award the punishment, just reassigned it to the right man (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Mar 22, 19:19:33
        
        The point is they used video evidence to................ (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 22, 19:25:40
        
        they know that if they do that then they'd be no reason why they wouldn't have to look at (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Mar 22, 19:30:03
        
        that`s easy (NCFC) - emmaroyds, Mar 22, 19:27:33

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.