Scum's finanacial statements (Long)
User Posted Link
As posted by someone below.
A few things jumped out;
?32.5M in debt *after* the CVA?! Fucking hell! BUT:-
"The debt to Norwich Union may never be repaid if we stay in the Championship, but the interest repayments will continue to be paid and are currently ?1.5m per year."
Followed by
"4. What plans do the club have to reduce the amount of debt outstanding or is our ability to reduce the debt solely reliant on us regaining our position in the Premiership?
The solution to the debt is the Premiership. Another way is to find a benefactor who will invest in shares, as has happened with eight of the last nine promoted clubs. "
Translation; They don't have a s**t-show of paying it off.
"Following the sale of both Bent and Davis, we are told that there are no or limited funds available to strengthen our weakened squad. Having only spent a small proportion of the transfer revenue on an unproven striker at our level, what has happened to the rest of the money? Or were you misleading us earlier in the year?
We did not say if players would stay or go. The answer to the question ?do you need to sell?? always has to be ?no? otherwise you undermine your negotiating position."
Translation - They're lying like f**k.
"15. Norwich publicly stated that on relegation their wage bill would reduce by more than a third, because of relegation clauses in player contracts. Given that such clauses are nowadays the norm rather than the exception, there would appear to be no need for parachute payments. What is ITFC's view on this issue?
This is an interesting question. If wages were reduced enough on relegation the need for a parachute payment would not be needed and would level the playing field in the Championship. However, negotiating a contract when you're in the Premiership that the wages will go down if you are demoted would be a lot harder than negotiating one in the Championship if wages will go up if you are promoted."
Translation - They have no intention of putting finanacial prudence first should a miracle happen and they get promoted.
"21. Why did the club chairman write a deliberately misleading article on the subject of supporter-elected board representation ahead of last year?s AGM?
This should be directed to the Chairman and I wasn?t aware that he had deliberately mislead. "
Translation - They know he's a lying bastard but can't say so in public.
Keeeerrrrist, I'm glad I'm not a binner! Even better, I'm glad I don't have any Norwich Union shares, cos they are going to take a hammering if the Scum go under.
Posted By: Iwan Husarmi on September 19th 2005 at 19:09:11
Message Thread
- Scum's finanacial statements (Long) (NCFC) - Iwan Husarmi, Sep 19, 19:09:11
- Their debt is ?32.5m PLUS the loan notes..... (n/m) (NCFC) - oh arr, Sep 20, 03:35:14
- ?28m is peanuts to a company of NU's size (n/m) (NCFC) - oh arr, Sep 20, 03:33:41
- I dont think that ?1.5m is the whole of the interest due to NU each year (NCFC) - oh arr, Sep 20, 03:20:35
- I take it there will be a whip round at half time next home game. (n/m) (NCFC) - franklin, Sep 19, 19:50:57
- I actually do have some sympathy for your ordinary Town fan (NCFC) - Tomblander, Sep 19, 19:27:39
- Well it's no fault of the supporters, (NCFC) - The Tudster, Sep 19, 19:29:31
- Makes lovely reading, doesn't it. (n/m) (NCFC) - The Tudster, Sep 19, 19:23:17
- For people who aernt financially minded.... (NCFC) - Klobo04, Sep 19, 19:11:48
- Creditor's Voluntary Agreement (NCFC) - Iwan Husarmi, Sep 19, 19:24:56
- I think its when you've already been through administration (NCFC) - pants, Sep 19, 19:21:54
- Corporate (or company) Voluntary Arrangement. (NCFC) - The Tudster, Sep 19, 19:21:07
- So basically... (NCFC) - Klobo04, Sep 19, 19:23:41
- Yep. The lesson. If you are going to get yourself in debt, do it big style. (n/m) (NCFC) - The Tudster, Sep 19, 19:27:17
- like the Channel Tunnel ! (n/m) (NCFC) - oh arr, Sep 20, 03:36:46
- Yep. The lesson. If you are going to get yourself in debt, do it big style. (n/m) (NCFC) - The Tudster, Sep 19, 19:27:17
- i'd have disagreed (n/m) (NCFC) - Denizen, Sep 19, 19:22:02
- bloody enter button, either i get full money or scum out of business, win-win (n/m) (NCFC) - Denizen, Sep 19, 19:22:59
- Emotionally yes, commercially no. (n/m) (NCFC) - The Tudster, Sep 19, 19:25:38
- bloody enter button, either i get full money or scum out of business, win-win (n/m) (NCFC) - Denizen, Sep 19, 19:22:59
- So basically... (NCFC) - Klobo04, Sep 19, 19:23:41
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.